Two-dimensional heat conduction boundary value problem
Let us consider the two-dimensional nonsymmetric heat conduction problem in a disk of radius . The heat conduction equation (1.8) in polar coordinates takes the form
(2.47)
The Dirichlet boundary conditions (1.13) in the two-dimensional case have the form
(2.48)
where is the initial condition, is the boundary condition, which is, of course, periodic in .
To get rid of the inhomogeneity, we introduce , let us choose the function , in accordance with (2.2). Then equation (2.47) and the boundary conditions (2.48) take the form
(2.49)
where .
The Neumann boundary conditions (1.14) in the two-dimensional case have the form
(2.50)
where is the normal derivative of the temperature on the circle of radius ; the direction of the normal coincides with the direction of the coordinate .
To get rid of the inhomogeneity, we introduce , let us choose the function — it satisfies condition (2.3): . Then equation (2.47) and the boundary conditions (2.50) take the form
Let us represent the function as a product of two functions , substitute it into equation (2.52) and carry out the transformations
We introduced the constant by analogy with the separation of variables for time and geometry. Now let us rewrite it as a system of two equations: one in the angle , the other in the radius .
(2.53)
The solution of the equation for the angle can be represented by a sine or a cosine, since both of these functions are periodic and satisfy the boundary condition , which imposes a restriction on — it must be an integer. We get two families of solutions; later we will take their superposition.
(2.54)
Let us take the coefficients and in front of the sine and cosine equal to one — these factors are absorbed into the expansion coefficients anyway. The solution of the equation for the radius has the form
(2.55)
where and are the Bessel functions of the first and second kind respectively, and are coefficients determined from the boundary conditions, and the weight ensuring the orthogonality of the eigenfunctions is . Moreover, for the function to be bounded as , it is necessary that : the Bessel function of the second kind is infinite at zero, as seen in figure (B.2).
Thus, the solutions of equation (2.52) have the form
(2.56)
Let us substitute the solutions (2.56) into the boundary conditions (2.49) and obtain
Clearly, the solution makes sense only when , which is possible only when . Let us denote the roots of the equation by — then the eigenvalues take the form
(2.57)
Zero and negative roots are no good: for we have , and for the eigenfunction — identically zero, which is not an eigenfunction, while for zero is not a root at all: . Negative roots give no new solutions: — the eigenfunction is the same up to sign. Therefore we take only the positive roots: .
Thus, the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions have the form
(2.58)
where is an arbitrary constant factor: the eigenfunction is defined up to it. Let us set — this factor is absorbed into the expansion coefficients anyway, as in the general solution.
To expand functions into a Fourier series in and we need to compute the norms and ; the weight for polar coordinates is .
Now let us substitute the solution (2.56) into the boundary conditions (2.51) and obtain
Clearly, the solution makes sense only when , which is possible only when . Let us denote the roots of the equation by — then the eigenvalues take the form
(2.62)
Here, unlike the Dirichlet problem, the zero mode survives: for zero is a root of the equation , and it corresponds to and the eigenfunction — a nonzero constant, that is, a fully fledged eigenfunction (the constant mode). We will count it as the first root: . For the zero root gives no eigenfunction (), so there we still take only the positive roots.
Thus, the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions have the form
(2.63)
where is an arbitrary constant factor; as before, we set it equal to one.
We compute the norms of the eigenfunctions in the same way as in the Dirichlet problem: the integral over the angle remains the same (2.59), while the integral over the radius takes a different value — we use formula (D.2) to compute the norm
Finally we obtain
(2.64)
The special case (for the eigenfunction ) we compute separately
(2.65)
The norms and have the form
(2.66)
The final solution of the two-dimensional Dirichlet boundary value problem with inhomogeneous boundary conditions takes the form
(2.67)
In the Neumann problem, unlike the Dirichlet one, the spectrum contains the zero mode (, ) — the case , which in the general solution (2.18) was set aside for separate consideration; it is precisely what gives the non-decaying term — the term with in the second sum. The final solution of the two-dimensional Neumann boundary value problem with inhomogeneous boundary conditions takes the form
(2.68)
To obtain the stationary solutions, we let time tend to infinity in the solutions found (), as was done for the general case in (2.18). The term with the initial condition vanishes, since ; the sources and boundary conditions stop depending on time, and the time integral for gives the factor :
The stationary solution of the two-dimensional Dirichlet boundary value problem takes the form
(2.69)
The stationary solution of the two-dimensional Neumann boundary value problem is not so simple. Unlike the Dirichlet problem, the purely Neumann stationary problem is not always solvable. The reduced function satisfies the homogeneous Neumann conditions and the stationary equation . Let us integrate it over the domain:
The boundary integral vanished due to the homogeneous Neumann conditions, and what remains is the solvability condition (2.22): — the total reduced source over the domain must vanish (otherwise heat accumulates and there is no steady state). When it holds, the solution is defined only up to an arbitrary additive constant : it corresponds to the zero mode (, ), whose amplitude is not fixed by the stationary equation. With this caveat the solution takes the form